2004 BIG 12 POSITION RANKINGS

OFFENSIVE BACKFIELD RECEIVERS OFFENSIVE LINEMAN
TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE
1. OKLAHOMA 3 9.33 1. TEXAS 6 6.08 1. TEXAS 3 5.67
2. TEXAS TECH 3 6.50 2. OKLAHOMA 3 5.67 2. NEBRASKA 5 5.00
3. TEXAS A&M  4 5.00 3. NEBRASKA 3 4.67 3. OKLAHOMA 4 4.63
4. IOWA ST 7 4.50 4. TEXAS A&M 7 4.57 4. MISSOURI 3 4.00
5. OKLAHOMA ST 4 4.38 5. MISSOURI 4 4.13 5. KANSAS ST 7 3.79
5. KANSAS ST 4 4.38 6. KANSAS ST 4 3.88 6. KANSAS 4 3.25
7. MISSOURI 8 4.31 6. COLORADO 4 3.88 7. OKLAHOMA ST 3 3.17
8. COLORADO 4 4.25 8. TEXAS TECH 7 3.57 8. TEXAS A&M 3 3.00
9. KANSAS 3 3.83 9. OKLAHOMA ST 4 3.50 9. TEXAS TECH 4 2.75
10. NEBRASKA 4 3.63 10. IOWA ST 3 2.50 10. IOWA ST 5 2.50
11. BAYLOR 3 2.67    BAYLOR -- DNQ 11. BAYLOR 4 2.38
      TEXAS -- DNQ    KANSAS -- DNQ    COLORADO -- DNQ

 

2004 BIG 12 POSITION RANKINGS

DEFENSIVE LINEMAN LINEBACKERS DEFENSIVE BACKFIELD
TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE TEAM PLAYERS AVE
1. TEXAS 3 7.17 1. TEXAS A&M 7 .4.79 1. OKLAHOMA 3 7.67
2. TEXAS A&M 3 6.50 2. TEXAS 3 4.00 2. TEXAS 4 6.63
3. OKLAHOMA 3 5.67 3. COLORADO 3 3.50 3. KANSAS ST 5 5.30
4. TEXAS TECH 4 4.88 4. BAYLOR 5 2.90 4. TEXAS A&M 3 4.33
5. OKLAHOMA ST 4 4.63    NEBRASKA -- DNQ 5. IOWA ST 7 3.29
6. KANSAS ST 3 4.00    OKLAHOMA -- DNQ 6. TEXAS TECH 5 3.10
7. COLORADO 5 3.90    OKLAHOMA ST -- DNQ 7. KANSAS 4 2.63
8. MISSOURI 5 3.50    TEXAS TECH -- DNQ 8. BAYLOR 4 2.13
9. KANSAS 3 3.17    KANSAS ST -- DNQ    OKLAHOMA ST -- DNQ
10. IOWA ST 4 3.13    MISSOURI -- DNQ     NEBRASKA -- DNQ
   NEBRASKA -- DNQ    IOWA ST -- DNQ     MISSOURI -- DNQ
   BAYLOR -- DNQ    KANSAS -- DNQ     COLORADO -- DNQ